My contact in the Westfalia factory in Rheda-Wiedenbrück suggested some while go, when the problem of blisters first emerged, that the issue was probably related to storing the 'bare' roofs in a cold and damp factory building prior to painting.
In 2015 I visited the Düsseldorf Caravan Salon (incidentally, the biggest motorhome and caravan show in Europe) before I bought a Westfalia Columbus. What particularly caught my eye though were the various Wingamm motorhome conversions which were all based on a monocoque GRP bodyshell. I spent some time on Wingamm and other forums and discovered that a common problem with these bodies is paint blistering. This is also found in GRP boat hulls and GRP sports cars (especially it seems with Lotus). The most common remedy is of course - largely because of cost - sanding down and respraying. A number of Wingamm owners reported several attempts to rectify the issue under warranty with this cheaper fix because the only other alternative was a whole new bodyshell! In some cases the blisters kept recurring and owners gave up. Ironically, this is why I bought a 'metal' Westfalia Columbus and now find myself the proud owner of a Marco Polo with a GRP roof because I couldn't find any reference anywhere to paint blister problems with the MP.
One theory as to why the problem occurs with the Wingamms is that steam generated inside from cooking and especially showering migrates through the GRP and is trapped by the lacquer coat, thereby causing the paint to blister when the conditions are right. I think I'm right in suggesting that the problem only arises in the MP's roof after they have been exposed to frosty conditions which result in the trapped water freezing and therefore expanding to cause blisters. Presumably, if an MP is stored in a garage in winter this is unlikely to occur, or at least delay the occurrence of blisters. Also, I guess that the occurrence of blisters in the MP is mitigated by the fact that the fabric roof sides, when the roof is raised, allows water vapour to disperse and the fact there is no shower to generate masses of steam.
I'm pretty confident that the paint blistering is confined to a badly produced/stored batch of roofs. Providing the factory has remedied these issues it should not re-occur. From my above comments I think you should conclude that a faulty roof should be replaced because of the likelihood of blistering continuing to appear in one of these faulty roofs. My roof was replaced a couple of months ago and so far so good. I wait to see how it is after a few frosts.